SECTION ONE: THE PROBLEM
SECTION TWO: WHAT CAN WE DO?
SECTION THREE: LET'S REBUILD YOUR PHONE!

Metadata: Your online identity (05:56)

play-rounded-fill

Metadata: Your online identity

[wcm_restrict plans=”admin”]

Previous NSA Director Michael Hayden – We kill people on the basis of metadata

Welcome to lesson 2 topic 5: Metadata, your online identity. This lesson started out with with previous NSA director Michael Hayden saying they kill people on the basis of metadata. But what is metadata exactly? Mails, location, website visits, cellphone-calls, (whatsapp) messages, connections to cellphone towers. All these types of data that tell something about your behavior. Connect them all together and you can get a pretty significant view of someone’s life. It tells what someone is doing, with who, where and why. Compared to the data of data-brokers, metadata is way more specific on a personal level. It knows you better then you know yourself. It’s almost never wrong in it’s observations. Knowing what somebody does tells you a lot about the driving factors of this person. If you are tapping into someones cellphone calls, you know that he or she is speaking the truth.

Did you know that, since 2014, the European Union introduced the ‘Data Retention Directive’. This is obliging member states to save all the metadata they collect for at least half a year. Pedro Cruz Villalón is Advocate General of the European Court of Justice. Cruz Villalón wrote a plea against the data retention directive. Cruz Villalón wrote in his plea that metadata belongs to a special category of personal data and that it should therefore be treated as such. “The use of metadata,” he wrote, “makes it possible to create a complete and accurate picture of a person’s private identity. So you can basically say that Metadata’ is more of a technical term to hide what it’s really about – these are behavioral data.

So why did the European Union introduce this law? Well, people in higher-up positions know you can predict a society’s behaviour based on metadata. Take the American Information Scientist Alex Pentland for example. He is a member of the World Economic Forum – this is one of the most influential organizations in the world. He believes that the analysis of metadata, also called ‘social physics’, could bring a revolution to human kind.

“For the first time we will have the data necessary to really know ourselves and to understand how our society is developing,” he writes in his book Social Physics (2015). His optimism has no boundaries:’ About only one In a few years, we will likely have access to incredibly rich data on the behavior of all of humanity, on an ongoing basis. “With social physics, Pentland is thus striving for a”computational theory of behavior, “a” mathematical explanation of why society responds as she responds.”

His ambitions are therefore far-reaching. Pentland believes that with the new methods of analyzing large amounts of data, not only can human behavior be perfectly measured, as can energy and movement, but it can also be predicted and even controlled. The goal is “to develop better systems” and “plan the future more precisely,” with societies such as “living laboratories.” This is critical. Social physics is based on an ultimate feasibility ideal.

In the name of “privacy for the people”, they have been promising to remove names from the collected metadata, because they are only interested in what the the analysis of behavioral data reveals about us. By using this technique companies and goverments promise that your collected data will be private. Really noble, but this does not solve the problem. According to a study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published in early 2015, of which Alex Pentland was a co-author. You can check the report yourself down below. The researchers analyzed several million credit card payments from tens of thousands of shoppers. By looking at spending patterns, locations of shops and the time of spending, they managed to connect 90 percent of the shoppers to unique identities. 

You’ll get my point by now. Metadata is not something to think lightly about. Not just on a personal level, but also to society as a whole. In my opinion we have to take back our privacy on a personal level, to make sure that power-hungry people on higher levels have no, or less tools to be able to manipulate human society as a whole. See you in the next lesson.

https://news.mit.edu/2015/identify-from-credit-card-metadata-0129/

[/wcm_restrict]